Regressions on master at commit r11-6189 vs commit r11-6159 on Linux/x86_64

H.J. Lu hjl@sc.intel.com
Thu Dec 17 06:03:09 GMT 2020

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on master at commit r11-6145 vs commit r11-6105 on Linux/x86_64
Next message (by thread): Regressions on master at commit r11-6190 vs commit r11-6105 on Linux/x86_64
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:
FAIL: 30_threads/future/members/poll.cc execution test

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link,  -O -flto -save-temps

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on master at commit r11-6145 vs commit r11-6105 on Linux/x86_64
Next message (by thread): Regressions on master at commit r11-6190 vs commit r11-6105 on Linux/x86_64
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list