Regressions on 8 at revision 268714 vs revision 268661

H.J. Lu hjl@gnu-29.sc.intel.com
Sat Feb 9 12:32:00 GMT 2019

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on 8 at revision 268714 vs revision 268661
Next message (by thread): Regressions on 8 at revision 268714 vs revision 268661
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda8.C   (test for excess errors)

New passes:

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on 8 at revision 268714 vs revision 268661
Next message (by thread): Regressions on 8 at revision 268714 vs revision 268661
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list