Regressions on 9 at revision 270619 vs revision 270583

H.J. Lu hjl@gnu-29.sc.intel.com
Sat Apr 27 12:02:00 GMT 2019

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on 9 at revision 270619 vs revision 270583
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 270622 vs revision 270600
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr90178.c scan-assembler-times xorl[\\t ]*\\%eax,[\\t ]*%eax 1

New passes:

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on 9 at revision 270619 vs revision 270583
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 270622 vs revision 270600
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list