Regressions on 8 at revision 265185 vs revision 265138

H.J. Lu hjl@gnu-ia32-1.sc.intel.com
Tue Oct 16 14:13:00 GMT 2018

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on 8 at revision 265185 vs revision 265138
Next message (by thread): Regressions on 8 at revision 265185 vs revision 265138
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cunroll-15.c scan-tree-dump-times cunroll "optimized:[^\n\r]*completely unrolled" 2

New passes:

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on 8 at revision 265185 vs revision 265138
Next message (by thread): Regressions on 8 at revision 265185 vs revision 265138
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list