Regressions on 8 at revision 261471 vs revision 261383

H.J. Lu Intel64 hjl@gnu-34.sc.intel.com
Tue Jun 12 05:56:00 GMT 2018

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 261451 vs revision 261432
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 261439 vs revision 261393
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for9.C  -std=c++98 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for9.C  -std=c++98 (test for excess errors)

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 261451 vs revision 261432
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 261439 vs revision 261393
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list