Regressions on 8 at revision 261258 vs revision 261225

H.J. Lu Intel64 hjl@gnu-34.sc.intel.com
Thu Jun 7 06:30:00 GMT 2018

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 261249 vs revision 261238
Next message (by thread): Regressions on 8 at revision 261258 vs revision 261225
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for9.C  -std=c++98 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for9.C  -std=c++98 (test for excess errors)

New passes:

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 261249 vs revision 261238
Next message (by thread): Regressions on 8 at revision 261258 vs revision 261225
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list