Regressions on trunk at revision 261242 vs revision 261232

H.J. Lu x32 x32@gnu-35.sc.intel.com
Wed Jun 6 22:39:00 GMT 2018

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 261242 vs revision 261232
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 261242 vs revision 261232
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for9.C  -std=c++98 (test for excess errors)

New passes:

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 261242 vs revision 261232
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 261242 vs revision 261232
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list