Regressions on trunk at revision 238779 vs revision 238770

Intel Automatic Testing System [Intel64 Core AVXi] i64coreavxi@ecsmtp.ims.intel.com
Wed Jul 27 13:02:00 GMT 2016


New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-66.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-68.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 2
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-6-big-array.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-6-big-array.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-6.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-91.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "accesses have the same alignment." 3
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-all-big-array.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-all.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-1.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 1

New passes:



More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list