Regressions on 5 at revision 228169 vs revision 228100

Bill Schmidt wschmidt@us.ibm.com
Sat Sep 26 22:32:00 GMT 2015

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 228166 vs revision 228166
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 228170 vs revision 228166
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:
FAIL: boehm-gc.c/gctest.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pointer_intent_7.f90   -O   (test for errors, line 26)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pointer_intent_7.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)

New passes:

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 228166 vs revision 228166
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 228170 vs revision 228166
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list