Regressions on trunk at revision 216689 vs revision 216688

H.J. Lu Intel64 LTO/FDO intel64profiled@gnu-mic-1.sc.intel.com
Sat Oct 25 13:44:00 GMT 2014

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 216689 vs revision 216688
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 216689 vs revision 216688
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/addr-sel-1.c scan-assembler a\\+1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/addr-sel-1.c scan-assembler b\\+1

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 216689 vs revision 216688
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 216689 vs revision 216688
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list