Regressions on 4.8 at revision 216417 vs revision 216135

H.J. Lu Intel64 hjl@gnu-34.sc.intel.com
Sat Oct 18 08:01:00 GMT 2014

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 216420 vs revision 216382
Next message (by thread): Regressions on 4.8 at revision 216417 vs revision 216133
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:
FAIL: g++.dg/tls/thread_local10.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/tls/thread_local10.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)

New passes:

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 216420 vs revision 216382
Next message (by thread): Regressions on 4.8 at revision 216417 vs revision 216133
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list