Regressions on trunk at revision 206265 vs revision 206260

H.J. Lu Intel64 LTO/FDO intel64profiled@gnu-mic-1.sc.intel.com
Tue Dec 31 19:24:00 GMT 2013

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 206265 vs revision 206260
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 206265 vs revision 206250
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:
FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++200x/stdc++.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++200x/stdc++_multiple_inclusion.cc (test for excess errors)

New passes:

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 206265 vs revision 206260
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 206265 vs revision 206250
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list