Regressions on trunk at revision 174558 vs revision 174550

H.J. Lu Intel64 LTO/FDO intel64profiled@gnu-16.sc.intel.com
Thu Jun 2 05:51:00 GMT 2011

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 174552 vs revision 174549
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 174558 vs revision 174550
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-9.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " = 1" 2
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-9.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " = 1" 2

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 174552 vs revision 174549
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 174558 vs revision 174550
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list