Regressions on trunk at revision 169351 vs revision 169336

H.J. Lu Intel64-profiled intel64profiled@gnu-16.sc.intel.com
Fri Jan 28 07:49:00 GMT 2011

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 169336 vs revision 169332
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 169353 vs revision 169351
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43479.c  -O2 -flto  line 18 h == 9
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43479.c  -O2 -flto  line 18 h == 9

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 169336 vs revision 169332
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 169353 vs revision 169351
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list