Regressions on trunk at revision 169150 vs revision 169144

H.J. Lu Intel64-profiled intel64profiled@gnu-16.sc.intel.com
Mon Jan 24 04:57:00 GMT 2011

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 169146 vs revision 169144
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 169151 vs revision 169141
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43479.c  -O2 -flto  line 13 h == 9
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43479.c  -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none  line 18 h == 9

New passes:

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 169146 vs revision 169144
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 169151 vs revision 169141
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list