Regressions on trunk at revision 169828 vs revision 169824

H.J. Lu Intel64-profiled intel64profiled@gnu-16.sc.intel.com
Fri Feb 4 16:50:00 GMT 2011

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 169824 vs revision 169822
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 169834 vs revision 169828
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43479.c  -O2 -flto  line 18 h == 9

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43479.c  -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none  line 13 h == 9

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 169824 vs revision 169822
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 169834 vs revision 169828
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list