Regressions on 4.6 at revision 172224 vs revision 172160

H.J. Lu Intel64 hjl@gnu-34.sc.intel.com
Sat Apr 9 03:56:00 GMT 2011

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 172216 vs revision 172215
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 172224 vs revision 172161
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/sfinae10.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/sfinae10.C (test for excess errors)

New passes:

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 172216 vs revision 172215
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 172224 vs revision 172161
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list