Regressions on trunk at revision 163782 vs revision 163775

H.J. Lu Intel64 hjl@gnu-1.sc.intel.com
Thu Sep 2 17:35:00 GMT 2010

Previous message (by thread): Gcc [trunk revision 163772] failed to boostrap on ia64!
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 163782 vs revision 163775
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr25923.f90  -O   (test for warnings, line 13)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr25923.f90  -O  (test for excess errors)

New passes:

Previous message (by thread): Gcc [trunk revision 163772] failed to boostrap on ia64!
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 163782 vs revision 163775
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list