Regressions on trunk at revision 166586 vs revision 166575

H.J. Lu Intel64 hjl@gnu-36.sc.intel.com
Thu Nov 11 04:43:00 GMT 2010

Previous message (by thread): 1 new GCC HEAD@166587 regression
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 166589 vs revision 166535
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/inliner-1.c scan-tree-dump-not optimized "hot_function ..;"
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/inliner-1.c scan-tree-dump-not optimized "hot_function ..;"

Previous message (by thread): 1 new GCC HEAD@166587 regression
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 166589 vs revision 166535
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list