Regressions on trunk at revision 156781 vs revision 156774

H.J. Lu ia32 hjl@gnu-29.sc.intel.com
Mon Feb 15 21:56:00 GMT 2010

Previous message (by thread): Gcc [trunk revision 156757] failed to boostrap on x86_64!
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 156776 vs revision 156766
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/xop-vpermil2pd-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/xop-vpermil2pd-256-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/xop-vpermil2ps-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/xop-vpermil2ps-256-1.c (test for excess errors)

New passes:

Previous message (by thread): Gcc [trunk revision 156757] failed to boostrap on x86_64!
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 156776 vs revision 156766
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list