Regressions on trunk at revision 168064 vs revision 168050

H.J. Lu Intel64-profiled intel64profiled@gnu-16.sc.intel.com
Sun Dec 19 20:32:00 GMT 2010

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 168046 vs revision 168044
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 168072 vs revision 168064
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43479.c  -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none  line 13 h == 9

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 168046 vs revision 168044
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 168072 vs revision 168064
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list