Regressions on trunk at revision 167663 vs revision 167648

H.J. Lu Intel64-profiled intel64profiled@gnu-16.sc.intel.com
Thu Dec 9 23:41:00 GMT 2010

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 167648 vs revision 167637
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 167668 vs revision 167663
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43479.c  -O2 -flto  line 18 h == 9

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43479.c  -O2 -flto  line 13 h == 9

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 167648 vs revision 167637
Next message (by thread): Regressions on trunk at revision 167668 vs revision 167663
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list