Regressions on trunk at revision 143780 vs revision 143777

H.J. Lu ia32 hjl@gnu-19.sc.intel.com
Fri Jan 30 14:32:00 GMT 2009

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on lto at revision 143777 vs revision 143750
Next message (by thread): Gcc [lto revision 143789] failed to boostrap on ia64!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:
FAIL: 30_threads/thread/member/2.cc execution test

New passes:

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on lto at revision 143777 vs revision 143750
Next message (by thread): Gcc [lto revision 143789] failed to boostrap on ia64!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list