Regressions on lto at revision 144321 vs revision 144316

H.J. Lu ia64 hjl@gnu-11.sc.intel.com
Fri Feb 20 16:06:00 GMT 2009

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on lto at revision 144320 vs revision 144313
Next message (by thread): Gcc [trunk revision 144352] failed to boostrap on ia64!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090219 c_lto_20090219_0.o-c_lto_20090219_0.o link

New passes:

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on lto at revision 144320 vs revision 144313
Next message (by thread): Gcc [trunk revision 144352] failed to boostrap on ia64!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list