9 GCC HEAD regressions, 5 new, with your patch on 2005-03-26T17:45:03Z.

Andrew Pinski pinskia@physics.uc.edu
Sun Mar 27 08:00:00 GMT 2005


On Mar 27, 2005, at 2:40 AM, GCC regression checker wrote:

> With your recent patch, GCC HEAD has some regression test failures,
> which used to pass.  There are 5 new failures, and 4
> failures that existed before and after that patch; 1 failures
> have been fixed.
>
> The new failures are:
> native libstdc++.sum 26_numerics/complex/13450.cc
> native libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/1-io.cc
> native libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc
> native libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekpos/char/1-io.cc
> native libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekpos/char/2-io.cc

These are not regressions really, they have always been failing
on powerpc-darwin7.  The problem is that when libstdc++ did not
report any results, the regression tester got confused.

-- Pinski



More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list