19 GCC HEAD regressions, 8 new, with your patch on 2004-08-31T04:08:43Z.
Andrew Pinski
apinski@apple.com
Fri Sep 3 08:47:00 GMT 2004
On Aug 31, 2004, at 2:24 PM, GCC regression checker wrote:
> With your recent patch, GCC HEAD has some regression test failures,
> which used to pass. There are 8 new failures, and 11
> failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
> have been fixed.
>
> The new failures are:
> native g++.sum g++.dg/rtti/typeid4.C
> native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.jason/template24.C
> native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.law/arg8.C
> native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh2.C
> native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.mike/net34.C
> native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.other/unchanging1.C
> native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb115.C
> native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb77.C
Reverting this patch:
+2004-08-30 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
+
+ * class.c (build_base_path): Use build_address directly.
+ * typeck.c (build_unary_op): Don't lower &a.b to pointer
+ arithmetic directly.
+ * typeck2.c (store_init_value): Don't assume !TREE_CONSTANT
+ means !initializer_constant_valid_p.
Fixes the problem.
The type of failure is we are calling into a vtable for some reason.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
More information about the Gcc-regression
mailing list