4 GCC HEAD regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2004-01-29T00:00:03Z.
Andrew Pinski
pinskia@physics.uc.edu
Thu Jan 29 08:07:00 GMT 2004
On Jan 28, 2004, at 23:33, GCC regression checker wrote:
> With your recent patch, GCC HEAD has some regression test failures,
> which used to pass. There are 0 new failures, and 4
> failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
> have been fixed.
>
> The old failures, which were not fixed or introduced by your patch,
> are:
> native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.abi/cxa_vec.C
> native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.brendan/new3.C
> native g77.sum g77.f-torture/execute/intrinsic77.f
These first three are caused by having shared libraries now, the
problem with the first two
is ld is warning about multiple operator new/deletes.
The third one is major failure in Darwin's backend and not marking some
functions as extern
and does not call the functions via a stub. I will look into see why
this is happening.
I can reproduce it at -O1 -finline -finline-functions. (Die rtl inline,
die).
This is one is caused by the machine still not having all the right
headers as it works on my
machine just fine:
> native objc.sum objc.dg/call-super-2.m
Note all of these are not really regressions at all as the third would
cause problems if
someone created a shared library with g77 on darwin and tried to link
with some main.
The first two are really ld bugs where it should not warn about
operator new/delete at all.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
More information about the Gcc-regression
mailing list