5 GCC regressions, 1 new, with your patch on 2003-05-05T21:59:06Z.

[Zack Weinberg]

Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@apple.com> writes:

>> The new failures are:
>> native gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-5.c
>>
> I'm pretty sure this is Zack's.  The routine is:
>
> x (int i)
> {
>    void *j[] = {&&x, &&y, &&z};
>    goto *j[i];
>   x:return 2;
>   y:return 3;
>   z:return 5;
>
> }
>
> and it gets compiled into:
>
> .data
> .const_data
>          .align 2
> LC0:
>          .long   L2
>          .long   L3
>          .long   L4
> .text
>          .align 2
>          .globl _x
> _x:
>          mflr r0
>          stmw r30,-8(r1)
>          stw r0,8(r1)
>          stwu r1,-64(r1)
>          mr r30,r1
>          bcl 20,31,"L00000000001$pb"
> "L00000000001$pb":
>          mflr r31
>          stw r3,88(r30)
>          addis r2,r31,ha16(LC0-"L00000000001$pb")
>          la r2,lo16(LC0-"L00000000001$pb")(r2)
>          lwz r0,0(r2)
>          lwz r9,4(r2)
>          lwz r2,8(r2)
>          stw r0,32(r30)
>          stw r9,36(r30)
>          stw r2,40(r30)
>          lwz r0,88(r30)
>          slwi r2,r0,2
>          addi r0,r30,24
>          add r2,r2,r0
>          addi r2,r2,8
>          lwz r2,0(r2)
>          mtctr r2
>          bctr
> L2:
> L3:
> L4:
>          .align 2
>          .globl _main
> _main:
>
> which is Not Right; the rest of the routine has gone away.  Perhaps
> some problem with the use count of the CODE_LABELs?

CODE_LABELs shouldn't go through my code at all, but I will try to
reproduce this with a cross compiler.  Tomorrow, when I'm awake.

zw