3 GCC regressions, 1 new, with your patch on 2003-07-16T15:57:15Z.

[Geoff Keating]

Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> writes:

> On Wednesday, Jul 16, 2003, at 16:50 US/Eastern, GCC regression
> checker wrote:
> 
> > With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
> > used to pass.  There are 1 new failures, and 2
> > failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
> > have been fixed.
> >
> > The new failures are:
> > native gcc.sum gcc.dg/asm-names.c
> 
> Not really a regression as it is the addition of a warning for weak
> support
> (I do not know how to fix this though).

I think we have to back out the change to the test.  If you need to
use weak support, you have to use the dg functionality for suppressing
the test unless it's available.

-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>