7 GCC regressions, 3 new, with your patch on 2002-06-20T20:51:36Z.

[Geoff Keating]

> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 06:16:36 +0100
> From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>

> GCC regression checker wrote:-
> 
> > With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
> > used to pass.  There are 3 new failures, and 4
> > failures that existed before and after that patch; 14 failures
> > have been fixed.
> > 
> > The new failures are:
> > powerpc-eabisim g77.sum g77.f-torture/execute/f90-intrinsic-bit.f
> > powerpc-eabisim gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/execute/20020108-1.c
> > native g77.sum g77.f-torture/execute/f90-intrinsic-bit.f
> > 
> > The old failures, which were not fixed or introduced by your patch, are:
> > powerpc-eabisim gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-prefetch-2.c
> > powerpc-eabisim gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-prefetch-3.c
> > powerpc-eabisim gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-prefetch-4.c
> > mips-elf gcc.sum gcc.dg/debug/debug-6.c
> > 
> > The fixed failures are:
> > native g++.sum g++.eh/catch9.C
> > native gdb.sum gdb.base/break.exp:
> > native gdb.sum gdb.base/call-ar-st.exp:
> > native gdb.sum gdb.base/call-rt-st.exp:
> > native gdb.sum gdb.base/constvars.exp:
> > native gdb.sum gdb.base/dbx.exp:
> > native gdb.sum gdb.base/display.exp:
> > native gdb.sum gdb.base/funcargs.exp:
> > native gdb.sum gdb.base/long_long.exp:
> > native gdb.sum gdb.base/miscexprs.exp:
> > native gdb.sum gdb.base/pointers.exp:
> > native gdb.sum gdb.base/return.exp:
> > native gdb.sum gdb.base/return2.exp:
> > native gdb.sum gdb.base/scope.exp:
> 
> Hmm, to be honest I think the regression checker has missed someone
> from the list.  Certainly, my patch didn't fix these, and I don't
> think yours did either 8-)

I did a double-take too, then I realised that the tree was broken
before the patch, so the regressions are "new" with respect to two
sets of changes ago.  I should probably change the tester to mention
this.

-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> <geoffk@redhat.com>