GCC build failed for powerpc-eabisim with your patch on 2002-06-13T18:40:10Z.
Roger Sayle
roger@eyesopen.com
Fri Jun 14 14:28:00 GMT 2002
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002 law@redhat.com wrote:
> > There were also 9 new regression test failures, and 15
> > failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
> > have been fixed.
> >
> > The new failures are:
> > mips-elf g++.sum g++.other/reload1.C
> > mips-elf gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/compile/20020106-1.c,
> > mips-elf gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/compile/950612-1.c,
> > mips-elf gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/execute/20011126-1.c
> > mips-elf gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/execute/20020506-1.c
> > mips-elf gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/execute/950607-2.c
> > mips-elf gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/execute/950704-1.c
> > mips-elf gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/execute/tstdi-1.c
> > mips-elf gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/unsorted/cc.c,
> Wow. At least some of these are due to Roger's change, not my shared
> RTL changes.
>
> For at least the 950612, the code appears to still be valid, but it trips
> an assembler warning. I'm in the process of verifying whether or not the
> other regressions are of a similar nature.
I'll try building a mips-elf simulator and bootstraping an IRIX 6.5
system to see if I can figure out whats going on. This is a bit
odd though, my 2002-06-13 cleanups shouldn't have affected any
behaviour (unless the MIPS backend explicitly disables if-conversion,
or cleanup_cfg isn't idempotent, i.e. running it more than once has
an observable effect on MIPS).
Sorry for any inconvenience.
Roger
--
More information about the Gcc-regression
mailing list