Updating INSN_STMT records.

[Jan Hubicka]

> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 05:04:16PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > What would you think about adding family of function
> > emit_insn_after_stmt/emit_insn_before_stmt and friends that do clone the
> > stmt from the passed instruction?
> 
> Yes, that would be fine.
Actually I was thinking about it more, and we will definitly want to
behave differently in some other cases, so probably adding third
argument usually used as INSN_STMT (after) sounds more sensible to me.
I will try to prepare patch tonight or early tomorrow.

Honza
> 
> 
> r~