GCC build failed for 3 targets with your patch on 2002-07-30T06:52:47Z.

Gabriel Dos Reis gdr@integrable-solutions.net
Tue Jul 30 00:21:00 GMT 2002


"GCC regression checker" <regress@redhat.com> writes:

[...]

| stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/maat/heart/tbox/objs/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -DIN_GCC    -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wtraditional -pedantic -Wno-long-long  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H  -o cc1plus \
|       cp/call.o cp/decl.o cp/expr.o cp/pt.o cp/typeck2.o cp/class.o cp/decl2.o cp/error.o cp/lex.o cp/parse.o cp/ptree.o cp/rtti.o cp/spew.o cp/typeck.o cp/cvt.o cp/except.o cp/friend.o cp/init.o cp/method.o cp/search.o cp/semantics.o cp/tree.o cp/repo.o cp/dump.o cp/optimize.o cp/mangle.o cp/cp-lang.o attribs.o c-common.o c-format.o c-pragma.o c-semantics.o c-lex.o c-dump.o  c-pretty-print.o main.o libbackend.a libcpp.a   ../libiberty/libiberty.a
| cp/class.o: In function `finish_struct_1':
| /maat/heart/tbox/cvs-gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/class.c:5199: undefined reference to `VF_DERIVED_VALUE'

I think this one resulted by an acciddent from Nathan's recent
(documentation) patch in that area.

-- Gaby



More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list