5 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2002-02-07T22:44:20Z.

[Geoff Keating]

> Mailing-List: contact gcc-regression-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
> list-help: <mailto:gcc-regression-help@gcc.gnu.org>
> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:gcc-regression-unsubscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
> list-post: <mailto:gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org>
> Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 20:40:27 -0500
> Cc: bkoz@redhat.com, trix@redhat.com
> From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
> 
> These 5 regressions all have to to fact that a warning was added
> for no return statement for a non-void function can some fix them?

Actually, I think they're a real bug.  These test cases don't specify
-Wall, so the warning shouldn't be appearing, should it?

> 
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
> 
> PS If no one sends in a patch into the gcc or gdb changes I will
> submit one tomorrow.
> 
> On Thursday, February 7, 2002, at 08:19 , GCC regression checker wrote:
> 
> > With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
> > used to pass.  There are 0 new failures, and 5
> > failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
> > have been fixed.
> >
> > The old failures, which were not fixed or introduced by your patch, are:
> > powerpc-eabisim gcc.sum gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2-1.c
> > powerpc-eabisim gdb.sum gdb.base/funcargs.exp:
> > native gcc.sum gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2-1.c
> > native gdb.sum gdb.base/funcargs.exp:
> > native gdb.sum gdb.threads/linux-dp.exp:
> >
> > For more information, see 
> > <http://people.redhat.com/geoffk/gcc-regression/>.
> >
> 


-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> <geoffk@redhat.com>