5 GCC regressions, 1 new, with your patch on 2001-06-28T19:44:55Z.
Fri Jun 29 12:12:00 GMT 2001
> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 11:09:42 +0200
> From: Jan Hubicka <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Content-Disposition: inline
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
> > With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
> > used to pass. There are 1 new failures, and 4
> > failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
> > have been fixed.
> > The new failures are:
> > native gdb.sum gdb.base/corefile.exp:
> Hmm, what does this mean. Is it GDB failure likely independent on my patch?
Well, it's really hard to tell. You made a flow change, and Jeff Law
made a dead-code-elimination change, and either could be causing
trouble, but if I had to guess I would suspect your patch because I
thought all the SSA stuff didn't run at -O0.
- Geoffrey Keating <email@example.com>
More information about the Gcc-regression