[regress@cygnus.com: 6 GCC regressions, 3 new, with your patch , on 2001-06-11T21:15:02Z.]

Geoff Keating geoffk@geoffk.org
Mon Jun 11 18:25:00 GMT 2001


> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
> cc: Phil Edwards <pme@sources.redhat.com>, gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org
> 
> 
> it's so
> 
> sooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
> 
> not my fault this time, I swear. This shit always breaks, for some 
> reason the string tests always tickle linkage issues with the C++ compiler.
> 
> I'm in the middle of other stuff
> 
> these fail on my x86-linux x powerpc-eabism tester, and have for a while, 
> so I'm not going to freak about it.
> 
> -benjamin
> 
> > The new failures are:
> > powerpc-eabisim libstdc++-v3.sum 21_strings/element_access.cc
> > powerpc-eabisim libstdc++-v3.sum 21_strings/substr.cc
> > powerpc-eabisim libstdc++-v3.sum 27_io/ios_members.cc

But they passed once...

The weird thing is that I can't see how those could have broken with
your patches.  I suspect some kind of linker random memory overwrite
bug.  Wasn't element_access.cc the testcase that went away for no
reason?

-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>



More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list