GCC build failed with your patch on 2001-01-09T11:35:00Z.
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva@redhat.com
Tue Jan 9 11:14:00 GMT 2001
On Jan 9, 2001, Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> wrote:
> powerpc-eabi is a 32-bit target. I don't want this patch. I've
> carefully not made this change for several years, because it will make
> code generation worse in the common case. How can a backend override
> the change?
Also note that you should be able to generate identical code for a
powerpc-eabi target on a platform that has 64-bit longs (and they'd be
used as HOST_WIDE_INT regardless of LONG_TYPE_SIZE), so it's probably
a good idea to work on having powerpc-eabi work in such a
configuration, instead of just punting at it by requiring a
HOST_WIDE_INT that is 32-bits wide.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
More information about the Gcc-regression
mailing list