GCC testing failed with your patch.

[Bruce Korb]

We seem to have a rather wide swath of people involved
with today's regression.  Since I don't see the mentioned
problem, it would be interesting to know how the failure
occurred.  Here are all the commits referenced by the
checkin failure notification:


+2000-40-30  Bruce Korb  <bkorb@gnu.org>
+2000-04-30  Richard Henderson  <rth@cygnus.com>
+2000-04-30  Zack Weinberg  <zack@wolery.cumb.org>
+2000-04-30  Bernd Schmidt  <bernds@cygnus.co.uk>
+2000-04-30  Richard Henderson  <rth@cygnus.com>
+2000-04-30  Richard Henderson  <rth@cygnus.com>
+2000-04-30  Richard Henderson  <rth@cygnus.com>
+2000-04-30  Richard Henderson  <rth@cygnus.com>
+2000-04-30  Richard Henderson  <rth@cygnus.com>
+2000-04-29  Richard Henderson  <rth@cygnus.com>
+2000-04-29  Zack Weinberg  <zack@wolery.cumb.org>
+2000-04-28  Zack Weinberg  <zack@wolery.cumb.org>
+2000-04-28  Kazu Hirata  <kazu@hxi.com>
+2000-04-28  Chris Demetriou  <cgd@sibyte.com>
+2000-04-28  Jason Merrill  <jason@casey.cygnus.com>
+2000-04-28  Richard Henderson  <rth@cygnus.com>
+2000-04-30  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
+2000-04-28  Cosmin Truta  <cosmint@cs.ubbcluj.ro>


GCC regression checker wrote:
> 
> (This is an automated message.)
> 
> With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
> used to pass.  There are 1 new failures, and 0
> failures that existed before that patch; 0 failures have been
> fixed.
> 
> The new failures are:
> gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/execute/951003-1.c
> 
> A complete list of failures is attached.  Also attached is a diff of
> the ChangeLog entries since the last time the regression tests passed.
> 
> GCC was configured with
> 
> CFLAGS=\'-O\' \
>   /sloth/delay/tbox/cvs/egcs/configure --target=powerpc-eabisim --prefix=/sloth/delay/objs/H-sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1 \
>     --enable-checking=misc,gc
> make
> make check-gcc