RFE: GCC testing failed

[Bruce Korb]

Geoff Keating wrote:
> 
> > Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 11:51:00 -0700
> > From: Bruce Korb <bkorb@sco.COM>
> 
> > +2000-40-30  Bruce Korb  <bkorb@gnu.org>
> > +2000-04-30  Richard Henderson  <rth@cygnus.com>
> > +2000-04-30  Zack Weinberg  <zack@wolery.cumb.org>
> > +2000-04-30  Bernd Schmidt  <bernds@cygnus.co.uk>
> > +2000-04-30  Richard Henderson  <rth@cygnus.com>
> > +2000-04-30  Richard Henderson  <rth@cygnus.com>
> > +2000-04-30  Richard Henderson  <rth@cygnus.com>
> > +2000-04-30  Richard Henderson  <rth@cygnus.com>
> > +2000-04-30  Richard Henderson  <rth@cygnus.com>
> > +2000-04-29  Richard Henderson  <rth@cygnus.com>
> > +2000-04-29  Zack Weinberg  <zack@wolery.cumb.org>
> > +2000-04-28  Zack Weinberg  <zack@wolery.cumb.org>
> > +2000-04-28  Kazu Hirata  <kazu@hxi.com>
> > +2000-04-28  Chris Demetriou  <cgd@sibyte.com>
> > +2000-04-28  Jason Merrill  <jason@casey.cygnus.com>
> > +2000-04-28  Richard Henderson  <rth@cygnus.com>
> > +2000-04-30  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
> > +2000-04-28  Cosmin Truta  <cosmint@cs.ubbcluj.ro>
> 
> It was one of rth's patches.  It's fixed now.  He sent a message to
> gcc-patches about it.
> 
> The reason for so many changelog entries is, of course, that the build
> was broken for a while.

How about marking likely suspects then so the hapless
don't worry so much.  I.e., the auto-notifier remembers
that the last attempt was a broken one, so, until such time
as it works again, add the note that the previous attempt
was *also* unsuccessful.  Thanks! - Bruce