1 GCC regressions, 1 new, with your patch on 2000-08-10T15:35:00Z.

Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu
Thu Aug 10 17:40:00 GMT 2000


 > From: Geoff Keating <geoffk@cygnus.com>
 > 
 > Hi Kaveh,
 > 
 > you need to update the testcase to allow for the extra warning:
 > 
 > output is:
 > /sloth/delay/tbox/cvs-gcc/egcs/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/920413-1.c: In function `x':
 > /sloth/delay/tbox/cvs-gcc/egcs/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/920413-1.c:8: warning: traditional C rejects the `U' suffix
 > /sloth/delay/tbox/cvs-gcc/egcs/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/920413-1.c:8: warning: width of integer constant may change on other systems with -traditional
 > 
 > PASS: gcc.dg/920413-1.c  (test for warnings, line 8)
 > FAIL: gcc.dg/920413-1.c (test for excess errors)
 > Excess errors:
 > /sloth/delay/tbox/cvs-gcc/egcs/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/920413-1.c:8: warning: traditional C rejects the `U' suffix
 > 
 > Thanks in advance!
 > - Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@cygnus.com>

Yup, I'll fix that.

Question: how do I tell gcc.dg that I expect *two* distinct errors on
the same line?  What is the syntax for that?

		Thanks,
		--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			Engagement Manager / Project Services
ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu		Qwest Internet Solutions


More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list