c++/10069: -include switch is improperly handled
Sean McNeil
sean@mcneil.com
Sat Mar 15 21:36:00 GMT 2003
The following reply was made to PR c++/10069; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com>
To: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/10069: -include switch is improperly handled
Date: 15 Mar 2003 13:26:37 -0800
I will back out my fix and see if it is still broken. To summarize, the
following type of command would fail:
gcc -include hack.h -O2 file.cc
as it would end up taking hack.h as an input file and precompile it into
hack.hcp or something like that. Further, hack.h wouldn't be included
for use by file.cc
I will send you a detailed example if it still fails after I back out
the change.
Cheers,
Sean
On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 13:19, Neil Booth wrote:
> Sean McNeil wrote:-
>
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10069
> > >
> > > Hi Sean,
> > >
> > > Which version of GCC do you see this bug with? I don't see this on the
> > > 3.3 branch.
> > > If you saw it on the mainline: there's a lot of ongoing work on the
> > > preprocessor, to
> > > move stuff from cpplib to the front ends. Maybe it is fixed already.
>
> Nothing was broken that needs fixing, IMO. I suspect any problems that
> are being observed are local-setup / configure / something else obscure
> dependent. Certainly all my changes aren't fixing anything; they're
> just putting code where it more properly belongs.
>
> Neil.
More information about the Gcc-prs
mailing list