c++/10069: -include switch is improperly handled

Sean McNeil sean@mcneil.com
Sat Mar 15 21:36:00 GMT 2003


The following reply was made to PR c++/10069; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com>
To: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
   gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/10069: -include switch is improperly handled
Date: 15 Mar 2003 13:26:37 -0800

 I will back out my fix and see if it is still broken.  To summarize, the
 following type of command would fail:
 
 gcc -include hack.h -O2 file.cc
 
 as it would end up taking hack.h as an input file and precompile it into
 hack.hcp or something like that.  Further, hack.h wouldn't be included
 for use by file.cc
 
 I will send you a detailed example if it still fails after I back out
 the change.
 
 Cheers,
 Sean
 
 On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 13:19, Neil Booth wrote:
 > Sean McNeil wrote:-
 > 
 > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10069
 > > > 
 > > > Hi Sean,
 > > > 
 > > > Which version of GCC do you see this bug with?  I don't see this on the 
 > > > 3.3 branch.
 > > > If you saw it on the mainline: there's a lot of ongoing work on the 
 > > > preprocessor, to
 > > > move stuff from cpplib to the front ends.  Maybe it is fixed already.
 > 
 > Nothing was broken that needs fixing, IMO.  I suspect any problems that
 > are being observed are local-setup / configure / something else obscure
 > dependent.  Certainly all my changes aren't fixing anything; they're
 > just putting code where it more properly belongs.
 > 
 > Neil.
 



More information about the Gcc-prs mailing list