optimization/2001: [3.2/3.3 regression] Inordinately long compile times in reload CSE regs

Steven Bosscher s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl
Wed Mar 12 19:26:00 GMT 2003


The following reply was made to PR optimization/2001; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
	lucier@math.purdue.edu, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/2001: [3.2/3.3 regression] Inordinately long compile
 times in reload CSE regs
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:19:45 +0100

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=2001
 
 Brad Lucier wrote:
 > Perhaps you were testing 3.4, where this is fixed?  Or perhaps it requires
 > a large number of registers before gcc screws up.  Here are the times I
 > now get, first for the 3.3 branch, then for 3.4:
 
 Uhm, yes I used 3.4.  I got so many gcc versions around now, picked the 
 wrong one.
 
 For 3.3,  I get:
 at -O0:  TOTAL                 :   4.66             0.24             6.14
 at -O2:  TOTAL                 : 316.67             1.71           329.12
 
 Ouch.
 
 > The patch that fixed this for 3.4 was
 >  
 >        http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2003-02/msg00742.html
 > 
 > Perhaps it's in the RedHat 3.2 branch, too.
 
 Is that a combination of these two patches?
 http://gcc.gnu.org./ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00858.html
 http://gcc.gnu.org./ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg01254.html
 
 rth mentioned 3 patches, but I can only find these two, and
 one other of which you said it did not apply to your sources.
 
 Any clue why this wasn't backported to 3.3?
 
 Greetz
 Steven
 
 
 



More information about the Gcc-prs mailing list