optimization/2001: [3.2/3.3 regression] Inordinately long compile times in reload CSE regs
Steven Bosscher
s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl
Wed Mar 12 19:26:00 GMT 2003
The following reply was made to PR optimization/2001; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
lucier@math.purdue.edu, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: optimization/2001: [3.2/3.3 regression] Inordinately long compile
times in reload CSE regs
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:19:45 +0100
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=2001
Brad Lucier wrote:
> Perhaps you were testing 3.4, where this is fixed? Or perhaps it requires
> a large number of registers before gcc screws up. Here are the times I
> now get, first for the 3.3 branch, then for 3.4:
Uhm, yes I used 3.4. I got so many gcc versions around now, picked the
wrong one.
For 3.3, I get:
at -O0: TOTAL : 4.66 0.24 6.14
at -O2: TOTAL : 316.67 1.71 329.12
Ouch.
> The patch that fixed this for 3.4 was
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2003-02/msg00742.html
>
> Perhaps it's in the RedHat 3.2 branch, too.
Is that a combination of these two patches?
http://gcc.gnu.org./ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00858.html
http://gcc.gnu.org./ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg01254.html
rth mentioned 3 patches, but I can only find these two, and
one other of which you said it did not apply to your sources.
Any clue why this wasn't backported to 3.3?
Greetz
Steven
More information about the Gcc-prs
mailing list