optimization/9279: [3.2 regression] [Sparc] combine bug
Gabriel Dos_Reis
gdosreis@sophia.inria.fr
Wed Jan 29 01:36:00 GMT 2003
The following reply was made to PR optimization/9279; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Gabriel Dos_Reis <gdosreis@sophia.inria.fr>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
Cc: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>, frank@g-n-u.de,
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/9279: [3.2 regression] [Sparc] combine bug
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 02:29:15 +0100 (MET)
| > As I explained to Eric, I would have been pleased to apply that
| > patch. However it turned out that it introduces (1) a performance
| > regression; (2) possibly a wrong code generation -- David gave some
| > references.
|
| Note that, as I said to David, I'm very skeptical about (2) for the patch
| _alone_ because it simply pessimizes (however rightfully, they are just
| plain wrong in the general case) the values returned by two predicate
| functions:
Sorry, I mistranslated your agreement on David's statement:
> This patch and the necessary PowerPC patch exposed other bugs in
> the compiler regarding REG_EQUAL notes in loop unrolling:
>
> 2002-10-04 David Edelsohn <edelsohn@gnu.org>
>
> * unroll.c (copy_loop_body): Remove REG_EQUAL note attached to
> copied instruction if the note is not loop invariant.
>
> The patches may have other co-dependencies we do not know about.
Ok.
[...]
| > I would suggest that, right after 3.2.2 release, interested parties
| > investigate the issue and submit a complete patch which we would
| > have sufficient time to test.
|
| I'm not very optimistic about this happening. I guess most of the developer
| resources will be focused on the 3.3 branch instead.
Well, that is just a suggestion. I hope 3.3 will be ready in time so
that 3.2-branch becomes obselete.
-- Gaby
More information about the Gcc-prs
mailing list