c++/1936: [2003-01-01] [New parser bug] pseudo-construction and >> operator
Mark Mitchell
mark@codesourcery.com
Thu Jan 2 19:16:00 GMT 2003
The following reply was made to PR c++/1936; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
To: "neil@gcc.gnu.org" <neil@gcc.gnu.org>,
"Jens.Maurer@gmx.net" <Jens.Maurer@gmx.net>,
"gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
"gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
"mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org" <mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org>,
"nobody@gcc.gnu.org" <nobody@gcc.gnu.org>,
"gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:
Subject: Re: c++/1936: [2003-01-01] [New parser bug] pseudo-construction and
>> operator
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 11:11:11 -0800
--On Wednesday, January 01, 2003 08:16:07 PM +0000 "neil@gcc.gnu.org"
<neil@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> Synopsis: [2003-01-01] [New parser bug] pseudo-construction and >>
> operator
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->mmitchel
> Responsible-Changed-By: neil
> Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jan 1 12:16:06 2003
> Responsible-Changed-Why:
> Mark, can I give you this?
Yes, but since it's not a regression I'm not going to worry about it
any time soon.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
More information about the Gcc-prs
mailing list