c++/1936: [2003-01-01] [New parser bug] pseudo-construction and >> operator

Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
Thu Jan 2 19:16:00 GMT 2003


The following reply was made to PR c++/1936; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
To: "neil@gcc.gnu.org" <neil@gcc.gnu.org>,
   "Jens.Maurer@gmx.net" <Jens.Maurer@gmx.net>,
   "gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
   "gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
   "mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org" <mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org>,
   "nobody@gcc.gnu.org" <nobody@gcc.gnu.org>,
   "gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/1936: [2003-01-01] [New parser bug] pseudo-construction and
 >> operator
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 11:11:11 -0800

 --On Wednesday, January 01, 2003 08:16:07 PM +0000 "neil@gcc.gnu.org" 
 <neil@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
 
 > Synopsis: [2003-01-01] [New parser bug] pseudo-construction and >>
 > operator
 >
 > Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->mmitchel
 > Responsible-Changed-By: neil
 > Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jan  1 12:16:06 2003
 > Responsible-Changed-Why:
 >     Mark, can I give you this?
 
 Yes, but since it's not a regression I'm not going to worry about it
 any time soon.
 
 Thanks,
 
 -- 
 Mark Mitchell                mark@codesourcery.com
 CodeSourcery, LLC            http://www.codesourcery.com



More information about the Gcc-prs mailing list