optimization/4490

[Wolfgang Bangerth]

The following reply was made to PR optimization/4490; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/4490
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 10:18:59 -0500 (CDT)

 > > What startles me with that one is that it is suspended. What is the reason 
 > > for that?
 > 
 > I use "suspended" for things we acknowledge are bugs, but
 > have no plans to ever fix.
 
 I'm not sure whether I like the approach, but I see that it's consistent 
 with our guidelines. For similar cases: can you leave a note in the audit 
 trail of this "no plans to fix" when you suspend a PR? 
 
 Thanks for the clarification! 
 
 W.
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth              email:            bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
                                www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/