optimization/1978: gcc 2.95.2 in HP-UX 10.20 with -O2 generat es wrong code

[Craig Rodrigues]

The following reply was made to PR optimization/1978; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@mediaone.net>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/1978: gcc 2.95.2 in HP-UX 10.20 with -O2 generat es wrong code
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 02:07:18 -0500

 ----- Forwarded message from sami.j.salonen@nokia.com -----
 
 Delivered-To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
 From: sami.j.salonen@nokia.com
 To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, peter.toft@nokia.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
    gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
 Subject: RE: optimization/1978: gcc 2.95.2 in HP-UX 10.20 with -O2 generat
 	es wrong code
 Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:53:00 +0200 
 Return-Receipt-To: sami.j.salonen@nokia.com
 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2652.78)
 
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: ext rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org]
 > Subject: Re: optimization/1978: gcc 2.95.2 in HP-UX 10.20 with -O2
 > generates wrong code
 >
 > Synopsis: gcc 2.95.2 in HP-UX 10.20 with -O2 generates wrong code
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 > State-Changed-By: rodrigc
 > State-Changed-When: Fri Jan  4 21:31:30 2002
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     Can you see if this problem still occurs with gcc 3.0?
 >     Binary snapshots of gcc 3.0 are available from HP if
 >     you go to http://www.hp.com and enter "gcc" in the search field.
 
 I tested it with gcc 3.0.1, and the bug did not appear. All the other
 conditions were the same as mentioned in the original report.
 
 -- 
 Sami
 
 ----- End forwarded message -----