debug/1621: Debugging with complex numbers

[Joseph S. Myers]

The following reply was made to PR debug/1621; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: <bangerth@dealii.org>,  <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,  <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: debug/1621: Debugging with complex numbers
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 23:24:36 +0000 (GMT)

 On 5 Dec 2002 bangerth@dealii.org wrote:
 
 >     Joseph, this report is now almost 2 years old, and versions
 >     3.0 and 3.1/2 have happened in between. Unfortunately, there
 >     are no testcases in the report, so I can't check the claims
 >     myself, but do you know whether the situation has or has
 >     not improved in the meantime?
 
 The testcase is at the URL given in the report 
 <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2000-12/msg00536.html>:
 
         static __complex__ double x = 2.0 + 3.0i;
         int main(void)
         {
           return 0;
         }
 
 (gdb) p x
 $1 = Invalid C/C++ type code 20 in symbol table.
 (gdb) p x$real
 No symbol "x$real" in current context.
 (gdb) p x$imag
 No symbol "x$imag" in current context.
 (gdb) quit
 
 You'll also want to try a testcase with automatic variables:
 
 	int main(void)
 	{
 	  __complex__double x = 2.0 + 3.0i;
 	  return 0;
 	}
 
 Both testcases should be tried with both stabs and DWARF2 debugging.  The 
 key part is that accessing the variable as a whole from GDB ought to work; 
 if that works in all four cases, then the manual need no longer refer to 
 "A future version of GDB", just say that GDB can handle debugging complex 
 numbers (possibly keeping the description of what's done with stabs as 
 information about the internals rather than the user interface).
 
 Some of the problem, if still there, may be a GDB problem, some may be a
 GCC problem.  But as long as the manual is making claims about what GDB
 will do in future, the presence of such claims in the manual is a GCC
 problem unless there's some reason to suppose them to be accurate.
 
 (DWARF3 has support for complex floating point numbers, but not complex
 integers which aren't in C99.  I don't really care about debugging for
 complex integers in any case, which have other known problems (division of
 complex integers doesn't work sensibly in GCC).)
 
 -- 
 Joseph S. Myers
 jsm28@cam.ac.uk