c/2894: Incorrect union padding on Linux/ARM port; otherarchitectures correct
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
Tue May 22 00:26:00 GMT 2001
The following reply was made to PR c/2894; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
Cc: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>, <jeffm@suse.com>
Subject: Re: c/2894: Incorrect union padding on Linux/ARM port; other
architectures correct
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 08:23:04 +0100 (BST)
On 22 May 2001, Neil Booth wrote:
> The above 2 lines make it clear that this is not really a "c" category
> bug, but a target bug. In future, please be more precise with the
> categorisation - it does save time.
However, since 2547 was mentioned as related, and 2820 also seems somewhat
similar, and both of those are on x86, is it so obvious that this *is* a
target bug?
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
More information about the Gcc-prs
mailing list