c++/2628

Petter Reinholdtsen pere@hungry.com
Sun May 20 14:46:00 GMT 2001


The following reply was made to PR c++/2628; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: nathan@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/2628
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 23:44:38 +0200

 [nathan@gcc.gnu.org]
 > You are mistaken about how operator new signals an error
 > condition.
 
 Nope, I knew all this.  I am just _very_ supprised to discover how
 the compiler assumes ::operator new (size_t) will throw exceptions
 when using -fno-exceptions.
 
 I believe this is a bug.
 
 I've learned about the flag -fcheck-new since I filed this bugreport,
 and believe it should be set by default when using -fno-exceptions.



More information about the Gcc-prs mailing list