c++/3524: Source can not be comiled using option -gdwarf

[Craig Rodrigues]

The following reply was made to PR c++/3524; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@mediaone.net>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/3524: Source can not be comiled using option -gdwarf
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 15:55:29 -0500

 ----- Forwarded message from Bailing Li <Bailing.Li@noaa.gov> -----
 
 Delivered-To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
 From: "Bailing Li" <Bailing.Li@noaa.gov>
 To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
 Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 19:40:02 GMT
 X-Mailer: Netscape Webmail
 Subject: Re: c++/3524: Source can not be comiled using option -gdwarf
 X-Accept-Language: en
 
 Not really.  Using  makes the code buildable, but it crashed in my pgdbg
 debug which is dwarf based.
 What's the difference between -gdwarf and -gdwarf-2?  
 Thanks any information,
 
 Bailing 
 
 ----- Original Message -----
 From: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
 Date: Friday, December 14, 2001 7:17 pm
 Subject: Re: c++/3524: Source can not be comiled using option -gdwarf
 
 > Synopsis: Source can not be comiled using option -gdwarf
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
 > State-Changed-By: rodrigc
 > State-Changed-When: Fri Dec 14 11:17:23 2001
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >    Reproduced in gcc 3.1 and gcc 3.0 branch.
 >    
 >    Is using -gdwarf-2 an acceptable workaround?
 > 
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-
 > trail&pr=3524&database=gcc
 
 ----- End forwarded message -----
 
 -- 
 Craig Rodrigues        
 http://www.gis.net/~craigr    
 rodrigc@mediaone.net